RAS PresidiumДоклады Российской академии наук. Химия, науки о материалах Doklady Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 2686-9535
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5111

THE KINETICS OF ESTERIFICATION OF AMMONIUM LACTATE WITH n-BUTANOL

PII
10.31857/S2686953522600714-1
DOI
10.31857/S2686953522600714
Publication type
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 511 / Issue number 1
Pages
88-94
Abstract
For the first time, the kinetics of the process of butyl lactate production by the interaction of ammonium lactate with n-butanol in the presence of water in the temperature range of 130–170°C in a closed system was studied as one of the stages of a new complex technology for the production of lactic acid and polylactide. The flow diagram of the process has been established. For the first time, a kinetic model of ammonium lactate esterification with n-butanol was proposed, considering the side formation of lactamide and the catalysis of esterification due to the acidity of lactic acid. The developed kinetic model can be used for mathematical modeling of the butyl lactate synthesis reactor.
Keywords
кинетика бутиллактат лактамид лактат аммония <i>н</i>‑бутанол молочная кислота этерификация
Date of publication
18.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
6

References

  1. 1. Сакович Г.В., Скиба Е.А., Будаева В.В., Гладышева Е.К., Алешина Л.А. // Докл. АН. 2017. Т. 477. № 1. С. 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1607672917060047
  2. 2. Федотов А.С., Антонов Д.О., Уваров В.И., Корчак В.Н., Цодиков М.В., Моисеев И.И. // Докл. АН. 2014. Т. 459. № 4. С. 437. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869565214340131
  3. 3. Shvets V., Kozlovskiy R., Kuznetsov A. // J. Clean. Prod. 2017. V. 155 P. 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.092
  4. 4. Meshalkin V.P., Dovì’ V.G., Bobkov V.I., Belyakov A.V., Butusov O.B., Garabadzhiu A.V., Burukhina T.F., Khodchenko S.M. // Mendeleev Commun. 2021. V. 31. № 5. P. 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2021.09.003
  5. 5. Kumar R., Mahajani S.M. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007. V. 46. № 21. P. 6873–6882. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061274j
  6. 6. Garlotta D. // J. Polym. Environ. 2001. 9. № 2. P. 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020200822435
  7. 7. Vaidya A.N., Pandey R.A., Mudliar S., Suresh Kumar M., Chakrabarti T., Devotta S. // Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005. V. 35. № 5. P. 429–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380590966181
  8. 8. Jamshidian M., Tehrany E.A., Imran M., Jacquot M., Desobry S. // Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010. V. 9. № 5. P. 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x
  9. 9. Pang X., Zhuang X., Tang Z., Chen X. // Biotechnol. J. 2010. V. 5. № 11. P. 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201000135
  10. 10. Кузнецов А.Е., Козловский Р.А., Белодед А.В., Козловский И.А., Козловский М.Р., Кучеренко В.В., Насиров И.Р. // Химическая промышленность сегодня. 2022. № 3. С. 2–13. https://doi.org/10.53884/27132854_2022_3_2
  11. 11. Sin L.T., Rahmat A.R., Rahman W.A.W.A. Preface. In: Polylactic Acid. William Andrew Publishing, 2013. P. xi–xii. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4377-4459-0.00013-5
  12. 12. Wee Y.J., Kim J.N., Ryu H.W. // Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2006. V. 44. № 2. P. 163–172. https://hrcak.srce.hr/109834
  13. 13. Reddy C.A., Henderson H.E., Erdman M.D. // Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1976. V. 32. № 6. P. 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.32.6.769-776.1976
  14. 14. Bai D.M., Yan Zh.H., Wei Q., Zhao X.M., Li X.G., Xu Sh.M. // Biochem. Eng. J. 2004. V. 19. № 1. P. 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2003.10.002
  15. 15. Venus J. // Biotechnol. J. 2006. V. 1. № 12. P. 1428–1432. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200600180
  16. 16. Hetényi K., Németh Á., Sevella B. // Chem. Eng. Process. 2011. V. 50. № 3. P. 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.01.008
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library