Везде

RAS PresidiumДоклады Российской академии наук. Химия, науки о материалах Doklady Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 2686-9535
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5111

INFLUENCE OF OXYGEN NONSTOICHIOMETRY AND ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION ON THE MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF MULTIFERROIC LuFeO

You can
PII
S3034511125060054-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034511125060054
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
M.N. Markelova
  • Occupation: PhD in Chemistry, Research Fellow at the Department of Chemistry
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
I.E. Graboi
  • Occupation: PhD in Chemistry, Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Chemistry
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
V.A. Amelichev
  • Occupation: PhD in Chemistry
  • Affiliation: S-Innovations
M.R. Konnikova
  • Occupation: Junior Research Fellow, Department of Physics
  • Affiliation:
    Lomonosov Moscow State University
    Kurchatov Institute National Research Center
S.I. Bredikhin
  • Occupation: DSc in Physics and Mathematics, Senior Research Fellow
  • Affiliation: Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Yu.S. Fedotov
  • Occupation: DSc in Physics and Mathematics, Research Fellow
  • Affiliation: Osipyan Institute of Solid State Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
A.R. Kaul
  • Occupation: DSc in Chemistry, Full Professor, Department of Chemistr
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Volume/ Edition
Volume 525 / Issue number 1
Pages
55-71
Abstract
Ceramic samples of LuFeO multiferroic were synthesized using solution chemical homogenization and subsequent annealing at 900–1100°C and at low oxygen pressure (10–10 atm), which was controlled by oxide getter mixtures FeO/FeO и FeO/LuFeO/LuO. Samples of LuFeO were obtained, differing in their non-stoichiometry and isotopic composition of the oxygen sublattice. The samples were studied using X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis, Raman spectroscopy, and magnetometry. It was shown that structural changes occurring with changes in the oxygen nonstoichiometry of LuFeO are manifested in the Raman scattering spectra and have a strong effect on the magnetic susceptibility of the samples. The developed technique of isotopic substitution of oxygen O with O in LuFeO made it possible to obtain samples with an O content of 44(1)%, showing a negative isotopic shift of the magnetic transition by 1.7–1.9 K, which indicates a noticeable electron–phonon interaction in the system.
Keywords
кислородная нестехиометрия гексагональные ферриты изотопный обмен комбинационное рассеяние магнитные свойства
Date of publication
01.01.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
80

References

  1. 1. Spaldin N.A., Ramesh R. Nat. Mater. 2019. V. 18. P. 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0275-2
  2. 2. Liu F., Hao Y., Ni J., Zhao Y., Zhang D., Fabbris G., Haskel D., Cheng Sh., Xu X., Yin L., Xiang H., Zhao J., Lü X., Wang W., Shen J., Yang W. npj Quantum Mater. 2023. V. 8. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-022-00522-x
  3. 3. Kudasov Yu.B., Markelova M.N., Maslov D.A., Platonov V.V., Surdin O.M., Kaul A. Phys. Lett. A. 2016. V. 380. № 46. P. 3932–3935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.054
  4. 4. Gamzatov A.G., Gajiev G.M., Aliev R.A., Emiraslanova L.L., Kaul A.R., Markelova M.N., Yu S.-C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018. V. 112. № 9. 092902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019408
  5. 5. Гаджиев Г.М., Гамзатов А.Г., Алиев Р.А., Абакарова Н.С., Маркелова М.Н., Кауль А.Р. Физика тв. тела. 2021. Т. 63. № 13. С. 2000–2003. https://doi.org/10.21883/FTT.2021.12.51656.30s
  6. 6. Wang K.F., Liu J.M., Ren Z.F. Adv. Phys. 2009. V. 58. № 4. P. 321–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730902920554
  7. 7. Nagata T., Ikeda N. AIP Adv. 2018. V. 8. № 7. P. 075312. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5026921
  8. 8. Horibe Y., Mori S., Ikeda N., Yoshii K., Maeno H., Murakami Y. Ferroelectrics. 2021. V. 584. № 1. P. 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00150193.2021.1984762
  9. 9. Пятаков А.П., Звездин А.К. УФН. 2012. Т. 182. С. 593–620. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0182.201206b.0593
  10. 10. Nygaard R.R., Markelova M.N., Ratovskiy V.Yu., Shurkina A.S., Vasiliev A.L., Kaul A.R. J. Solid State Chem. 2023. V. 319. P. 123811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123811
  11. 11. Kim Y.J., Konishi S., Hayasaka Y., Kakeya I., Tanaka K. CrystEngComm. 2020. V. 22. P. 1096–1105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CE01666J
  12. 12. Isobe M., Kimizuka N., Iida J., Takekawa S. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C. 1990. V. C46. P. 1917–1918. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270190004784
  13. 13. Sekine T., Katsura T. J. Solid State Chem. 1976. V. 17. P. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596 (76)90200-0
  14. 14. Christianson A.D., Lumsden M.D., Angst M., Yamani Z., Tian W., Jin R., Payzant E.A., Nagler S.E., Sales B.C., Mandrus D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008. V. 100. P. 107601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.107601
  15. 15. Groot J.D., Marty K., Lumsden M.D., Christianson A.D., Nagler S.E., Adiga S., Borghols W.J., Schmalzl K., Yamani Z., Bland S.R., Souza R.T., Staub U., Schweika W., Su Y., Angst M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012. V. 108. P. 037206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.037206
  16. 16. Bourgeois J., Hervieu M., Poienar M., Abakumov A.M., Elkaim E., Sougrat M.T., Porcher F., Damay F., Rouquette J., Tendeloo G.V., Maignan A., Haines J., Martin C. Phys. Rev. B. 2012. V. 85. P. 064102. http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.064102
  17. 17. Wang F., Kim J., Gu G.D., Lee Y., Bae S., Kim Y-J. J. Appl. Phys. 2013. V. 113. P. 063909. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792036
  18. 18. Weida W., Kiryukhin V., Noh H.-J., Ko K.-T., Park J.-H., Ratcliff II W., Sharma P.A., Harrison N., Choi Y.J., Horibe Y., Lee S., Park S., Yi H.T., Zhang C.L., Cheong S.-W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008. V. 101. P. 137203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.137203
  19. 19. Phan M.H., Frey N.A., de Groot J., Sales B.C., Mandrus D.G., Strikanth H. Solid State Commun. 2010. V. 150. P. 341–345. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2009.11.030
  20. 20. Xiang H.J., Kan E.J., Wei S.H., Whangbo M.H., Yang J. Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 80. № 13. P. 132408. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.132408
  21. 21. Tanaka M., Iwasaki H., Siratori K., Shindo I. J. Phys. Soc. Japan. 1989. V. 58. № 4. P. 1433–1440. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.58.1433
  22. 22. Zhao G., Conder K., Keller H., Mueller K.A. Nature. 1996. V. 381. P. 676–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/381676a0
  23. 23. Талденков А.Н., Снегирев В.В., Бабушкина Н.А., Калитка В.С., Кауль А.Р. ЖЭТФ. 2018. Т. 153. № 3. С. 458–465. http://doi.org/10.7868/S0044451018030112
  24. 24. Conder K. Phys. C: Supercond. Appl. 2023. V. 614. P. 1354376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2023.1354376
  25. 25. Khasanov R., Shengelaya A., Morenzoni E., Conder K., Savić I.M., Keller H. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2004. V. 16. P. S4439–S4455. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/40/003
  26. 26. Bussmann-Holder A., Keller H. Condens. Matter. 2022. V. 7. № 10. P. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat7010010
  27. 27. Hofer J., Conder K., Sasagawa T., Zhao G., Willemin M., Keller H., Kishio K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000. V. 84. P. 4192–4195. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4192
  28. 28. Gweon G.H., Sasagawa T., Zhou S.Y., Graf J., Takagi H., Lee D.-H., Lanzaraet A. Nature. 2004. V. 430. P. 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02731
  29. 29. Pringle D.J., Tallon J.L., Walker B.G., Trodahl H.J. Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 59. P. R11679–R11682. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/40/003
  30. 30. Zhao G., Conder K., Angst M., Kazakov S.M., Karpinski J., Maciejewski M., Bougero C., Pshirkov J.S., Antipov E.V. Phys. Rev. B. 2000. V. 62. P. R11977–R11980. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R11977
  31. 31. Stucky A., Scheerer G.W., Ren Z., Jaccard D., Poumirol J.-M., Barreteau C., Giannini E., van der Marel D. Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. P. 37582. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37582
  32. 32. Kalinov A.V., Gorbenko O.Yu., Taldenkov A.N., Rohrkamp J., Heyer O., Jodlauk S., Babushkina N.A., Fisher L.M., Kaul A.R., Kamenev A.A., Kuzmova T.G., Khomskii D.I., Kugel K.I., Lorenz T. Phys. Rev. B. 2010. V. 81. P. 134427. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.134427
  33. 33. Wang G.Y., Chen X.H., Wu T., Wu G., Luo X.G., Wang C.H. Phys. Rev. B. 2006. V. 74. P. 165113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.165113
  34. 34. Porotnikova N.M., Khodimchuk A.V., Ananyev M.V., Eremin V.A., Tropin E.S., Farlenkov A.S., Pikalova E.Yu., Fetisov A.V. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2018. V. 22. P. 2115–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-018-3919-x
  35. 35. Rischau C.W., He X., Mazza G., Gariglio S., Triscone J.-M., Ghosez Ph., del Valle J. Phys. Rev. B. 2023. V. 107. P. 115139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.115139
  36. 36. Kubaschewski O., Alcock C.B. Metallurgical thermochemistry. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979. 462 p.
  37. 37. Hazen R.M., Jeanloz R. Rev. Geophys. 1984. V. 22. № 1. P. 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG022i001p00037
  38. 38. Hou Y., Yao Y.P., Dong S.N., Teng M.L., Sun X.F., Li X.G. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2011. V. 42. P. 1695–1700. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2916
  39. 39. Yang H.X., Tian H.F., Wang Z., Qin Y.B., Ma C., Li J.Q., Cheng Z.Y., Yu R., Zhu J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2012. V. 24. P. 435901. http://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/24/43/435901
  40. 40. Babushkina N.A., Belova L.M., Gorbenko O.Yu., Kaul A.R., Bosak A.A., Ozhogin V.I., Kugel K.I. Nature. 1998. V. 391. P. 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/34380
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library